TheUsDaily

Representation for Ghost Guns | Credits: Getty Images
News Politics

RINO Governor Allows Ban on “Ghost Guns”

United States: Republican Vermont Governor Phil Scott’s recent decision to let a bill prohibiting so-called “ghost guns” pass without his endorsement represents a notable affront to Second Amendment rights. This legislation, which bans the possession of firearms lacking serial numbers, signifies a perilous move towards unwarranted government encroachment and the erosion of essential liberties.

“Ghost guns,” typically constructed from kits obtained online or manufactured via 3D printing technology, have ignited fervent discussions due to their lack of traceability. Opponents argue that these firearms circumvent state and federal background checks, yet such viewpoints neglect the fundamental right of Americans to possess arms without undue intrusion, according to some reports.

The statute requires individuals to submit their unserialized firearms to licensed dealers for background checks and serial number imprints. Furthermore, perpetrators caught using non-serialized weapons in criminal activities could face stiffer penalties. This mandate is not only impractical but also subverts the core principles of personal liberty and self-defense embedded in the Second Amendment.

Governor Scott, in correspondence to legislators, voiced his skepticism regarding the bill’s “feasibility and repercussions.” Despite his reservations, he allowed the bill to become law, capitulating to those who erroneously advocate serialization as a requisite for public safety. This concession underscores a troubling pattern of compromising constitutional rights for the illusion of safety.

Proponents of gun control are celebrating this encroachment on personal freedoms. Moms Demand Action has praised it as a “lifesaving measure,” while the Giffords Law Center asserts that “Vermonters will be safer with these regulations.” These groups fail to acknowledge that such laws do not tackle the fundamental causes of crime and violence but rather penalize law-abiding citizens, as highlighted by some reports.

The Vermont Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, which has historically contested state gun control measures, remains vigilant. President Chris Bradley underscored the absurdity of Vermonters having to litigate to reclaim rights that should never have been violated. He emphasized the injustice of taxpayers financing the defense of these unconstitutional statutes only to reimburse legal fees when they ultimately triumph in court.

This new legislation serves as a stark reminder that the battle for Second Amendment rights persists. It is imperative to oppose any initiatives that erode these foundational freedoms, ensuring that all Americans can exercise their right to bear arms without undue governmental interference.

What’s your Reaction?
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
+1
4
+1
2
+1
0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *